The decision will not have an immediate effect on Forcadell, as she already benefits from the third degree status of detention (day-release privileges), which already grants her greater privileges than what her original sentence dictated. However, in this interlocutory ruling, the Supreme Court has declared itself legally competent, as the sentencing court, to resolve the appeals regarding the provisions of Article 100.2. And although it is the Supreme Court that ultimately decides who will have jurisdiction in this matter, that the decision should be taken by the same sentencing court that grants the ruling on the appeal has hardly any precedent in Spain and none in Catalonia. As a result of this decision, the Provincial Court of Barcelona will submit the appeals of Article 100.2 that it had pending, concerning the 1 October political prisoners, to the Supreme Court. Conversely, on that same day, the Provincial Court of Girona rejected the appeal against the application of Article 100.2 for Dolors Bassa.
10 August 2020
7 August 2020
22 July 2020
The Supreme Court rejects the application of the provisions of Article 100.2 of the Penitentiary Regulation to Carme Forcadell
21 July 2020
19 July 2020
Blatant violations of the rule of law like this one are never included in the Rule of Law report that the Commission publishes each year on the rule of law developments in each Member State.
Through this form, you can send an email to the Commission asking them to consider this case in their next report.
Let's fill up the inboxes of the Commissioners to make it more difficult for them to ignore these in the next report.
Denuncia aquest cas davant de la UE!
Enviant un email fent clic aquí